\documentstyle[amssymb,12pt]{article}
\def\baselinestretch{1.2}
%\textwidth=18cm
%\oddsidemargin=-1cm
\begin{document}

\begin{center}
{\bf ASSIGNED EXERCISES OF MATH544} 
{\it February, 2001}
\end{center}



\vspace{0.4cm}

\noindent
{\bf  CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS}

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 1}.\, Find the shortest distance berween two points $A$ and $B$ 
on the plane using the polar coordinates.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 2}.\, Find the shortest distance between two points $A$ and $B$
on a sphere.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 3}.\, Find the shortest distance between two pints $A$ and $B$
on a right cylinder.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
In the above problems (2) and (3) you may write the expressions for the
length on the sphere and on the cylinder then use the calculus variations
directly. On the other hand you may use the length formula in $R^{3}$ 
with the constarints $ x^2+y^2=1$ and $x^2+y^2+z^2=1$ respectively.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 4}.\, Let $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\, L(x,y,y^{\prime})dx$ be a functional.
Let $y$ be continuous in $[a,b]$. Assume that the Euler Lagrange equation 
holds on the interval $(a,b)$. Let $y$ be differentiable at all 
$x \varepsilon [a,b]$ except one point $x_{0} \varepsilon (a,b)$.
Assume that $y^{\prime}$ tends to $m$ or $n$ as $x$ tends to $x_{0}$ from the
left or from the right. 

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 4.a}.\,Porve that ${\partial L \over \partial y^{\prime}}$ 
and $L-y^{\prime}\, {\partial L \over \partial y^{\prime}}$ must be continuous
 functions of x at all points in $[a,b]$ including the corner points like
$x_{0}$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 4.b}.\, Let $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\, ({y^{\prime}}^{2}-1)^{2} dx$. 
Suppose a corner exists at $x_{0} \varepsilon [a,b]$. Minimize this 
functional (porve that there exist $m$ and $n$ where the functional $J(y)$
has a minimum value).

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 5}.\,Determine the function extremizing (sometimes called the 
stationary function associated with) the functional $J(y)=
\int_{0}^{1} \, {y^{\prime}}^{2}\,f(x) dx$ when $y(0)=0$ and $y(1)=1$, where
$f(x)=-1$ for $0 \le x <{1 \over 4}$ and $f(x)=+1$ for
 ${ 1 \over 4} < x \le 1$

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 6}.\,The Euler-Lagrange (EL) equation is in general an ODE of the 
second order. We have (in the following we use the notation $p=y^{\prime}$)
$$L_{px}+L_{py}y^{\prime}+L_{pp}\,y^{\prime \prime}=L_{y}$$
In the derivation of the EL we usualy do not assume (in advance) 
the existance of the second derivative of $y$. It can easily be shown, however,
that $y^{\prime \prime}$ exists at least at those  points where $L_{pp} \ne 0$
(prove this). Consider the functional $J(y)=\int_{-1}^{1}\, y^2\,(p-2x)^2\,dx$
with $y(-1)=0$ and $y(1)=1$. Find the the function which minimisez the 
functional under the given boundary conditions. Prove that $y^{\prime \prime}$ 
does exist at $x=0$.


\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 7}.\,Let $J(y)=\int_{0}^{\pi}\, {y^{\prime \prime}}^{2} dx$ with
the constraint $\int_{0}^{\pi}\,y^{2} dx=1$ and with the boundar conditions
$y(0)=y^{\prime \prime}(0)=0$ , $y({\pi})=y^{\prime \prime}({\pi})=0$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 7.a}.\,Find the function extremizing the functional $J(y)$

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 7.b}.\, Consider the above problem without the constraint.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 8}.\,If $l$ is not preassigned, show that the stationar functions 
corresponding to the problem $\delta\, \int_{0}^{l}\, {y^{\prime}}^{2} dx=0$
with $y(0)=2$ and $y(l)=\sin l$ are of the form $y=2+2x\, \cos l$, where $l$ 
satisfies the transcendental equation $2 +2l \cos l - \sin l=0$. Also verify
that the smallest positive value of $l$ is between ${\pi/2}$ and ${3\pi/4}$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 9}.\, If $l$ is not preassigned, show that the stationary functions 
corresponding to the problem $\delta\, \int_{0}^{l} [{y^{\prime}}^{2}+4(y-l)]dx
=0$, with $y(0)=2$ and $y(l)=l^2$ are of the form $y=x^2-2(x/l)+2$, where
$l$ is one of two real roots of the equation $2l^4-2l^3-1=0$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 10}.\, Find the shortest distance berween the line $y=x$ and the parabola
$y^{2}=x-1$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 11}.\, Find the Lagrangian $L(x,y,y^{\prime})$ such that Euler-Lagrange
equation coincides with the (Emden-Fowler) equation $y^{\prime \prime}+
{2 \over x}\, y^{\prime}+y^5=0$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 12}.\, Determine the natural boundary condition at $x=b$ for the 
variational problem defined by $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\,L(x,y,y^{\prime}\,dx
+G(y(b))$, $y \in C^2[a,b]$ , $y(a)=y_{0}$ , where $G$ is a given 
differentiable function. As an application of this problem let
$L={y^{\prime}}^2$, $y \in [0,1]$, $y(0)=1$, $y(1)$ is unspecified and
$G=y^2$. Find $y$ extremizing this problem.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 13}.\, Give a proof that if $\int_{a}^{b}\, h^{\prime}(x)\,f(x) dx=0$ 
for all $h(x)$ satisfying $h(a)=h(b)=0$, $h(x)$ is continuous and 
$h^{\prime}(x)$ is piecewise continuous in $[a,b]$ where $f(x)$ is piecewise
continuous in $[a,b]$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf 14}.\, {\it Legendre Condition}. In the theory of extrema of functions of
single variable, a necessary condition for a minimum, besides $f^{\prime}(x)=
0$,
is that $f^{\prime \prime} \ge 0$ (if it exists). A condition somewhat 
analogous to this holds for functionals. Let us suppose that there is an
admissible function $y$. for which $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\, L)x,y,y^{\prime}) dx$
is a minimum. Then $f(\epsilon)=J(y+\epsilon h)$ has a minimum at $\epsilon=0$;
accordingly $f^{\prime}(0)=0$ (from which follows the Euler-Lagrange equation
$E_{y}(L)=0$ and $f^{\prime \prime}(0) \ge 0$, assuming its existence.
Hence for all all $h$,

$$f^{\prime \prime}(0)=\int_{a}^{b}\,[L_{yy}\,h^{2}+
2 L_{y y^{\prime}}\,h\,h^{\prime}+
L_{y^{\prime} y^{\prime}}\,{h^{\prime}}^{2}] dx \ge 0$$.

\noindent
Choose a special variation 

\begin{equation}
h=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}
               0 & \mbox{$ a \le x \le \xi-\epsilon $}\\
            1+(x-\xi)/\epsilon  & \mbox{$ \xi-\epsilon \le x \le \xi$}\\
            1-(x-\xi)/\epsilon & \mbox{$ \xi \le x \le \xi+\epsilon$}\\
               0 & \mbox{$ \xi+\epsilon \le x \le b $}
            \end{array}
            \right. 
\end{equation}

\noindent
If we substitute this function in the above expression an let $\epsilon 
\rightarrow 0$, then the term

$$ {1 \over \epsilon^2}\, \int_{\xi-\epsilon}^{\xi+\epsilon} \,
L_{y^{\prime} y^{\prime}} dx$$

\noindent
will dominate the left hand side of the above inequality and determine its 
sign. Thus the the sign of $L_{y^{\prime} y^{ \prime}}$ determines the sign of 
$f^{\prime \prime}(0)$, and for minimum, the Legendre condition 
$L_{y^{\prime} y^{\prime}} \ge 0$ must hold. We have the Legendre test:

\vspace{0.2cm}

\noindent
{\bf Theorem 1}. {\it The Legendre test. If\\
(i) Euler-Lagrange equation is satisfied,\\
(i) the range of intgeration is sufficiently small,\\
(iii) the sign of $L_{y^{\prime} y^{\prime}}$ is constant throughout 
this range,

\noindent
then J(y) is a minimum or a maximum value of $J$ according as the sign of 
$L_{y^{\prime} y^{\prime}}$ is positive or negative.} 

\noindent
In case $L$ contains more dependent functions, the Legendre condition is 
that the matrix $L_{y_{i}^{\prime} y_{j}^{\prime}}$ be positive or negative 
definite, that is 
$$\Sigma_{(i,j)} \, \lambda_{i}\, \lambda_{j}\, 
L_{y_{i}^{\prime} y_{j}^{\prime}} \ge 0 \mbox{ or} \, \le 0$$
\noindent
for all $\lambda$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf The following part is prepared by using the book {\it An Intoruction 
to the
 Calculus of Variations} by Charles Fox, Oxford Press (1950). In particular 
the second chapter on the second variations.}

\vspace{0.1cm}

\noindent
{\bf 15}.\, {\it The second variation}: Let $y=y(x)$ be the path of 
integration for which the integral $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\, L(x,y,y^{\prime})dx$
is minimium or maximum (sometimes called the integral is stationary). Consider
all admissible functions $y+\varepsilon h$ where both $y$ and $h$ belong to
$C^{2}[a,b]$. Then
$$J(y+\varepsilon h)=J(y)+{\varepsilon^{2} \over 2}\,J_{2}+O(\varepsilon^{3})$$
where
$$J_{2}=\int_{a}^{b}[h^{2}\,{\partial^{2} L \over \partial y^{2}}+
2\,h\,h^{\prime}\,{ \partial^{2} L \over \partial y \, \partial y^{\prime}}+
{h^{\prime}}^{2}\, {\partial^{2} L \over \partial {y^{\prime}}^{2}}]\,dx$$
If $J(y)$ is minimum (or maximum) the sign of $J_{2}$ must be
 positive (or negative) without depending upon the choice of $h(x)$ , for all 
sufficiently small $\varepsilon$. For simplicity we use the following notation:
$L_{0}={\partial L \over \partial y}$, $L_{1}={\partial L \over \partial 
y^{\prime}}$. $L_{00}={\partial^{2} L \over \partial y^{2}}$, $L_{01}={\partial
L \over \partial y\, \partial y^{\prime}}$, $L_{11}={\partial^{2} L \over
\partial {y^{\prime}}^{2}}$. Then $J_{2}$ takes the form
$$J_{2}=\int_{a}^{b}\,[L_{00}\,h^{2}+2L_{01}\,hh^{\prime}+
L_{11}\,{h^{\prime}}^{2}]dx$$.

\noindent
We have the following Lemma.
Proof is straightforward (done in the class)

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Lemma 2}.\,{\it Let $h(a)=h(b)=0$, then
$$J_{2}=\int_{a}^{b}\,\{h^{2}\,(L_{00}-{d \over dx}\,L_{01})-h\,{d \over dx}\,
(h^{\prime}\,L_{11})\}dx$$.
}
\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Definition}.\, {\it (Jacobi equation and Jacobi field). Let 
$u \in C^{2}[a,b]$. Then the folowing equation is called the Jacobi
equation.

$$\{L_{00}-{d \over dx}(L_{01})\}\,u-{d \over dx} ( L_{11} {du \over dx})=0$$

\noindent
the function $u$ satisfying this second order ODE is called the Jacobi field}

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Lemma 3}.\,{\it If $h(a)=h(b)=0$ and is a Jacobi field then
$$J_{2}=\int_{a}^{b}\, L_{11}\,[h^{\prime}-h\,{u^{\prime} \over u}]^2\, dx,$$
}
\noindent
{\bf Proof}.\, Taking the term $L_{00}-{d \over dx}(L_{01})$ from the
Jacobi equation and inserting into the expression for $J_{2}$ given
in the first Lemma one obtains the required result. 

\vspace{0.2cm}

\noindent
If the term $\{h^{\prime}-h\,({u^{\prime} \over u})\} \ne 0$ and $L_{11}$
has constant sign for all points of the extremal arc $AB$, where $A=(a,y(a))$
and $B=(b,y(b))$, then $J_{2}$ must have a sign which is independent of the 
choice of $h$. Now in the extremal case
$$J(y+\varepsilon h)-J(y)={\varepsilon^2 \over 2}\,J_{2}+O(\varepsilon^3)$$
Hence $J$ takes its minimum value (or maximum value) if $L_{11}$
is positive (or negative) at all points on the extremal curve $y(x)$
with $x \in [a,b]$. This is essentially the Legendre test stated above. 

If , however, $L_{11}$, doesnot keep its sign constant at all $x \in [a,b]$
on the curve $y(x)$, then the value $J(y)$ is neither a minimum nor a maximum.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
If the term $\{h^{\prime}-h\,({u^{\prime} \over u})\}$ vanishes at all points
of the extremal curve $y(x)$. Then it is clear that $h(x)=\alpha\, u(x)$, where
$\alpha$ is an arbitrary constant. Along the extremal curve $y(x)$  the first
variation vanishes. If in addition $h(x)=\alpha u(x)$ is choosen then the 
second variation, $J_{2}$ vanishes as well. The sign of 
$\delta J=J(y+\varepsilon h)-J(y)$ will depend on the third variation 
$\delta J={\varepsilon^3 \over 6}\, J_{3}$, where

$$J_{3}=\int_{a}^{b}\,[h^{3}\,L_{000}+3h^{2}h^{\prime}\,L_{001}+
3h{h^{\prime}}^{2}L_{011}+{h^{\prime}}^{3}L_{111}]dx$$

\noindent
Since the sign of $\delta J$ depends on that of $\varepsilon$ there can be no
maximum or minimum value of $J$ unless $J_{3}$ vanishes, in which case the
sign of $\delta J$ will depend on that of $J_{4}$ , the fourth variation.
In order to avoid this difficulty Jacobi proposed a test. This test provides
whether the $h(x)=\alpha u(x)$ at all points of the extremal curve $y(x)$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Definition}: Let $u(x)$ be a solution of the Jacobi equation. 
Let $u(a)=0$. This means that the Jacobi field vanishes at the point 
$A=(a,y(a))$. The all other points on the extremal curve $y(x)$ at which
$u(x)$ vanishes are called the {\it conjugate points} to the point $A$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
The jacobi field ( a function satisfying the Jacobi equation with $u(a)=0$)
may be given as the linear sum of the fundamental solutions $u_{1}$ and 
$u_{2}$ of the Jacobi equation.
$$u(x)= a_{1} u_{1}(x)+a_{2} u_{2}(x)$$
where $a_{1}$ and $a_{2}$ are constants. Since $u(a)=0$, then
$${ u_{1}(a) \over u_{2}(a)}=-{a_{1} \over a_{2}}$$
Hence if $x$ is the abscissa of the conjugate point to $A$ ($u(x)=0$) then 
$${u_{1}(x) \over u_{2}(x)}=-{a_{1} \over a_{2}}$$
It shows that this ratio is the same  for all conjugate points. 
This is the way obtaining the conjugate points. We now give a nice way of 
determining the fundamental solutions $u_{1}$ and $u_{2}$. Since the function
$y(x)$ , the solution of the Euler-Lagrange equation is second order ODE
then it contains two independent constants of intgetation $y(x,c_{1},c_{2})$.
It is easy to prove the following Lemma.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Lemma 4}.\, $u_{i}={\partial y \over \partial c_{i}}$, $i=1,2$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
Hence the conjugate points are easily determined from the folowing formula.
Let $Y=({\partial y \over \partial c_{1}})/({\partial y \over \partial 
c_{2}})$ then 
$$Y(x)=Y(a)$$
Let $A^{\prime}$ be the first conjuagte point to $A$ when moving on the 
extremal curve $y(x)$ in the direction from $A=(a,y(a))$ to $B=(b,y(b))$.
There are three possibilities

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
(i)\, $B$ lies between $A$ and $A^{\prime}$,\\
(ii)\,$B$ coincides with $A^{\prime}$,\\
(iii)\, $B$ lies beyond $A^{\prime}$.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
In all three cases $u(x)$ vanishes at $A$, but in case $(i)$ it cannont 
vanish again at the point $B$, in case $(ii)$ it vanishes again at $B$, and
in case $(iii)$ it vanishes again at some point of the arc $AB$ lying 
betweein $A$ and $B$. In case $(i)$ we have $u(a)=h(a)=0$ but $u(b) \ne 0$,
$h(b)=0$. Hence $u(x)$ can not be proportional to $h(x)$ at all points of the
extermal arc $AB$. Therefore we must have 
$(h^{\prime}-h{u^{\prime} \over u})^{2} > 0$ at all points of $AB$ , 
except, possibly, at finite number of points where $h(x)$ and $h^{\prime}(x)$
vanish simultaneously. Then we have the following theorem {\it Jacobi test}.

\vspace{0.3cm}

\noindent
{\bf Theorem 5}.\, {\it Let $y=y(x)$ be the curve connecting the points
$A$ and $B$ for which the functional $J(y)=\int_{a}^{b}\, L(x,y,y^{\prime}) dx$
takes its exremum value. Let $A$ and $A^{\prime}$ be the conjugate points
on this curve. If {\bf (i)} $B$ lies between $A$ and $A^{\prime}$ and 
{\bf (ii)} $L_{11}$ has constant sign for all points on the arc $AB$, 
then $J(y)$ is a minimum (maximum) when $L_{11} > 0$~ ($L_{11} < 0$)
}
\vspace{0.2cm}

\noindent
For all the other cases we need higher variations for extremum tests.

\end{document} 

 





